THE HOOK

If you ask most people what they need to build real wealth, they will tell you a higher salary. The common belief is we need to get the promotion, land the better job, and earn more money. It is the most intuitive response to the financial independence question and it is also, in many cases, the wrong one. The number that actually determines your financial future is not how much you make. It is the gap between what you make and what you spend. And that gap is something almost anyone can control, regardless of where their salary starts.

THE LENS

Personal finance is cluttered with metrics such as net worth, credit score, and rate of return. But research and the simple math of compound interest point to one variable that outweighs almost all of them in determining long-term wealth outcomes. The savings rate. The percentage of your income you consistently invest is the primary driver of when, and whether, you reach financial independence. A person earning $60,000 and saving 30% will accumulate more wealth over a working lifetime than a person earning $120,000 and saving 10%, and the math behind that is simpler than most people expect.

When a strong savings rate is combined with time in the market, the math becomes something close to magic. Compound interest has been called the eighth wonder of the world — and the numbers behind it earn that reputation. To see why, consider two completely different career paths for someone entering adulthood. The income gap between them is significant. The wealth gap, over time, tells a different story.

Consider two ambitious people making different choices at age 18. One enrolls in a two-year HVAC trade program, graduates debt-free at 20, and starts earning and saving immediately. The other pursues pharmacy school: four years of undergraduate education followed by four years of pharmacy school, graduating at 27 with an average student loan debt of $170,000 at 6.5% interest. By the time the pharmacist makes their first loan payment, the HVAC technician has seven years of compounding working in their favor. That head start is worth more than most people realize.

In addition to having to often dig themselves out of student loan debt, traditional high earning career professionals face a compounding headwind that rarely gets discussed honestly. The U.S. progressive tax system means that as income rises, an increasing percentage goes to federal taxes across the 24%, 32%, and 35% brackets, plus Social Security and Medicare taxes and state income taxes. The pharmacist earning $127,000 is not taking home $127,000. After federal income tax, payroll taxes, and state taxes, the effective take-home is considerably lower. When coupled with $23,000 per year in loan payments for the first decade, the disposable income available for saving is substantially compressed. The salary looks impressive on paper. The financial picture is more complicated.

Now introduce the ambition factor. The HVAC technician who builds skills for 20 years has something the pharmacist does not: the ability to start a business with low overhead, an established client base, and a trade that is always in demand. An ambitious technician who launches their own HVAC business at 40 can reasonably generate $150,000 in owner income, growing at 3% per year, while saving 30% of that income. The comparison at that point is no longer close. See the appendix for the full numbers.

In The Simple Path to Wealth, JL Collins makes a case that most people spend their entire financial lives optimizing the wrong variables. They chase income, obsess over stock picks, and agonize over market timing. Investment analyst Kenneth Fisher has been quoted saying “time in the market beats timing the market”, and the data consistently shows this to be true. Along with time, the lever that actually moves the needle is savings rate. Raise it and the path to financial independence shortens dramatically, regardless of where income starts. Collins’ framework is not anti-ambition. It is anti-distraction. Focus on the gap, not the gross.

ZOOM OUT

Three questions worth sitting with this week:

1.    What is your current savings rate? Not what you think it should be, what it actually is.

2.    If you increase your savings rate by 5% starting today, what would the compounding impact look like over the next 20 years?

3.    Are you optimizing for income, or for the gap between income and spending? They are not the same pursuit.

THE VIEW

Three things worth your time this week:

📚  Read

The Simple Path to Wealth by JL Collins — the clearest, most direct argument for savings rate as the primary lever of financial independence. Collins writes for people who want to cut through the noise and focus on what actually works. Directly relevant to this issue and an easy recommendation for any reader regardless of where they are in their financial journey.

🧠  Concept worth knowing

The F.I. Number — the investment portfolio value at which your savings generate enough passive income to cover your expenses indefinitely, typically calculated as 25x your annual spending (based on the 4% withdrawal rule from the Trinity Study). The formula makes clear why savings rate matters more than income: the lower your spending, the smaller the F.I. Number you need to hit, and the faster your savings reach it. Two levers, both pointing the same direction.

📊  Stat worth sharing

According to research cited in The Simple Path to Wealth, someone saving 50% of their income can reach financial independence in approximately 17 years, regardless of their income level. Someone saving 10% will take roughly 43 years. The difference is not the salary. It is the rate.

Zoom out. See what’s possible.

— Chuck

If this issue resonated with you, the best way to support The Wider Lens is simple: share it with one person who would find it valuable. Forward this email, send them the link, or share it on social. It means more than you know.

APPENDIX — A Tale of Two Professions

The numbers behind the comparison are more striking than most people expect. Here is what the math looks like over a working lifetime.

Assumptions
  HVAC Entrepreneur: Trade school at 18, working at 20. Starting salary $54,000, 3% annual raises. Starts own business at 40 with $150,000 owner income growing at 3%/year. Saves 20% pre-business, 30% post-business. Zero student debt. 8% average annual investment return.

  Pharmacist: 4 years undergrad + 4 years pharmacy school, starts working at 27. Starting salary $127,000, 3% annual raises. Student loan debt: $170,000 at 6.5% interest, 10-year repayment (~$23,000/year). Saves 20% of after-debt income during repayment, 25% after debt is paid. 8% average annual investment return.

  Neither scenario accounts for Social Security, employer 401K match, or taxes on investment gains. Both figures represent investment portfolio value only. The HVAC entrepreneur’s business equity at sale is not included.

Age

HVAC Entrepreneur

Pharmacist

Leader

20

Starts working & saving

Year 2 of undergrad

25

$85,000

Still in school

HVAC

27

$130,000+

Starts working, $170K debt

HVAC

30

$205,000

$98,000

HVAC

35

$393,000

$295,000

HVAC

37

$495,000

$394,000 (debt paid off)

HVAC

40

$711,000 (launches business)

$672,000

HVAC

45

$1,332,000

$1,286,000

HVAC

50

$2,290,000

$2,235,000

HVAC

55

$3,752,000

$3,684,000

HVAC

65

$9,277,000 + business equity

$9,172,000

HVAC

The pharmacist’s total loan repayment over 10 years: approximately $231,000 on a $170,000 loan. The HVAC entrepreneur’s business equity at sale (not included above) could add $400,000 to $800,000+ at age 60-65 based on a 3x EBITDA valuation of a modest established HVAC business. The point of this table is not that pharmacy is the wrong career. It is that salary alone does not tell the story. Savings rate, debt load, timing, and entrepreneurial ambition are the variables that determine the outcome.

SOURCES

-The Simple Path to Wealth by JL Collins (2025 edition): amazon.com/Simple-Path-Wealth-financial-independence/dp/1737724103
-Trinity Study — Cooley, Hubbard, and Walz, AAII Journal, February 1998: retirementresearcher.com/safe-withdrawal-rates-for-retirement-and-the-trinity-study
-4% Rule origin — William Bengen, 1994: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/4%25_rule
-Savings rate to FI timeline — 50% / 17 years and 10% / 43 years: Mr. Money Mustache, "The Shockingly Simple Math Behind Early Retirement," 2012: mrmoneymustache.com/2012/01/13/the-shockingly-simple-math-behind-early-retirement
-ChooseFI savings rate explainer: choosefi.com/financial-independence/how-to-calculate-your-savings-rate
-Pharmacy school average student loan debt — AACP 2024 report, $170,956: finance.yahoo.com/news/average-pharmacy-school-debt
-Hedonic Treadmill: behavioraleconomics.com/resources/mini-encyclopedia-of-be/hedonic-treadmill

Reply

Avatar

or to participate

Keep Reading